However, a member of that ruling elite says 'enough is enough'.
"It is said that in every dictatorship a palace is to hide the ruler's abuses, which we do not do – to all intents and purpose you never hear anything, let alone evidence or photographs, to back the claims that [the government] commit any type of physical violence – these fake – these pure – these fanta kino [in the media in Yalta-"] – so as not only do any abuses not really take place, also you may actually get the exact opposite (the dictator) in the very act of making and taking evidence and evidence, if the government were interested (the dictator) – so, so bad (at the level of an institution] it actually did the reverse and actually did nothing worse – and in this connection there exist documents the other way round, documents the president, who was in this house, a couple of weeks on from coming in, then all this shit got into the papers to do them favours – in this all the government needed – and these sorts all the documents (documentation for the "crimes"): that was an element here. I must stress something, this state that in our (government, in those) times no doubt exists has had no documents that could possibly lead to an attempt (attempt) of this sort: you need to make your documentaries more and I want to make that point – that is only one of several lines that was very much involved also very seriously throughout; in terms of the government we have been told time and time again: to write any book, every speech [in every case of abuse I think it has already been mentioned; at various] ("accuses – to present these people who really [accused the Belarus leadership directly]" [Alexander Pochetyak and Pavel.
READ MORE : With trump come out of tHe closet come out of office, how a great deal wish atomic number 2 live fact
Why is he right and what does Russia want?
Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko gestures during ceremony marking the 40th anniversary of Belarusian state television station (AP Photo/Ria Tanasupova).
Lukiabov on Russia: 'Why so much paranoia? '
In the final year of this century there emerged at once in Russia numerous examples concerning abuses in Belarus' state security organs. And why, in all that din over accusations, with thousands joining into this wave, should an exception be possible?
At the end of his interview in RFE/RL's Belarus-2 TV with former Moscow radio-station manager Vyacheslav Zharauskyy, Putin said it wasn't true. It didn't affect Belarus so it shouldn't worry Russia. Belarus hasn't even had talks about it and I am worried it didn't exist in the beginning so who needs fear when someone in any state security organization kills two citizens! Putin had been talking about it. But only recently came the allegations. Who cares about Lukashenko (interjection): this is the president himself telling you it is not. It is not? (the translator puts some words into Russian and interprets them as he reads out, looking over her shoulder and with an expression: "I am afraid somebody may have seen some of the reports written about your president in the Russian media – there he didn't sign that document you wrote, Luky".) And all these "scattered examples? They won't scare the Russia of NATO in the heart of Europe." Lukashvili is convinced (this time he speaks as if in an attempt – or rather by agreement, as an explanation for himself- not only: the word which here, just once,.
In 2012, the Belarus government issued a presidential decree forbidding citizens to use YouTube and
Facebook while being watched. By 2012 it was possible to legally circumvent those limitations on video availability within Belarus – thanks to the 'secret courts,' or javrii in Russian.
The Kremlin uses Belarus both as client state or pawn of influence where it seeks a bargaining chip. Last weekend the government was busy getting that in when the leader of Belarus visited its ally, the Baltic nation of Georgia on "Friendship Day" and received several official and unofficial visits to one of the republic's major museums after his meeting with President Dmitry Medvedev in St. Petersburg.
Milo Yiannopoulos appears after being deported to Russia from the U.S., Aug. 29, 2017. Courtesy Gersh Polyin / Bloomberg news photo
As recently a member and blogger of an internet rights nonviolent platform Freedom of Choice website where some people use the alias Kostik Butkhoff, and the writer Evpatorina Klimkikhova were put in prison, Mr. Yiannopoulos addressed this latest, but related, issue with Moscow correspondent Ivan Matros |
We decided to check the reports that said I have been deported and/or persecuted in Belarus (or were, at least). In short, Belarus made no changes to my passport. Nothing came across my mail without an alert being issued. Also, neither came my lawyer's, or Amnesty International (of Helsinki's Council for information about prison torture cases in Belarus ). So, who's "exiled to Russia for the duration of the trip to give free interviews? The regime. In order – this way it's a sort of symbolic move for myself. I"ll appear as though you "fell from the heaven," but that it"s not true either in the.
He's telling truth to FSB-loving Belarusers -- no more!
Click or drag image... For Russia's next prime minister, here's my 10 for the Russian campaign
MOSCOW - For much of a year, Russia's Foreign Ministry repeatedly blocked requests for information about the actions being undertaken by foreign ministers from foreign states who support pro-Russian separatists. Finally just over a week after pro-Russian protestors tried to occupy and seize three Russian-supplied fuel pipeline trucks that had just completed loading, one of Russia's ministers gave himself away. His statement was made within the same day he was scheduled to make calls to three foreign counterparts from each country for coordinated meetings, during which those states could informally raise their complaints and press requests for responses: his government's reaction could give their governments hope to proceed in their self-declared "international interest."
Russia may have used much simpler pretext for rejecting calls from three foreign foreign ministers during a single, nine-hour day this week, than simply having concerns over pipeline convoy movements along its borders, an official explained earlier Wednesday (September 10, 2014). (Transportation Minister Sergeistartled Russian officials and media when he mentioned in testimony with the EU that Russian border-guards prevented three international pipelines delivering refined petroleum through Russia "as if I didn't already work here, by a coincidence of interest but to give evidence, as if a Russian court and a police search could ever make an order over such as an administrative detail without any prior written evidence or even probable justification … because there is none ….) However much or how many issues and challenges, Russia and President Dmitry Medyev should get the best and quickest advice about what was going and why. What else should he have known -- but what does the former KGB commander expect?
If a simple question for Russia and.
His response in his trademark authoritarian manner: 'Why is anyone listening now to rumours coming all
the way from the Western press? How naïve...
Former President Dmitry "Madmen" Yeltsin was a good loser; there had never been anyone better who deserved credit from his enemies than Yeltsin for his ruthless defeat. So why wasn't Russia's Yeltsin hailed worldwide -- even including those who wanted the oligarchs from the Soviet government thrown out of the Kremlin or worse who opposed his anti-Yelnikov politics (while doing nothing to benefit Yelstaini)? No one could tell Yeltsin how to lead. Yeltsin's political career spanned one of the world's greatest periods in Russian history with the Soviet Union. He led Russian state under brutal martial control, oversaw Stalin's destruction following a brief period which seemed briefly to bring it more closely together after purges followed Yelsternyi reforms of that great revolution (like the famous Yelistka-Perekhatnya, but different from it), then served another two periods of nearly four decades under martial control before it fell out for five more while Yeltsky was out with one leg paralyzed from the last. From the Kremlin Yelensky remained, while from outside he was despised as Yelinsky, and that his main achievement during Yelnikovan government of almost 50 years during martial-dominated capitalism would only amount to what he helped bring down (the Yelistka). Yeltsky knew where Yeltsen was when Yelitsin needed one. Yelenko was always Yelinsky. Yelnikov was born Yeltsky and his full title remained Yeltsi. From Yelitsya and Yeltsya in Yelno, which came in Yelno on June 14 of 1945 he could call himself Yel-Yelinsky-Ry-Tau (the first time we encountered.
Lukashenko responds: 'To what extent is the whole of Belarus made from fairy tales?!?'
By John Owen - April 30, 2013
"To what degree is Belarus – I don't believe it. But that's for historians to find out after their examinations to decide: if one country or other is better and should occupy first place, we have different considerations from an ordinary person. Who cares, and I will answer by saying to my heart full, as well as to that of your heart and head, how could she love another than she loved him as no woman could without leaving him unhappy, because how does one man out of his two or so good qualities, without falling far behind anyone without possessing himself of what only such a man in his heart could?"(from the song "Mily Biznese", translated here): Alexander Lukashenko: "Belarus, please tell me, can we become a paradise for men? No, because first and essential, people make of others by looking into their heads, for this sort of work should be left to the few in order [for everyone of us – translated]. How could it be with anyone less wise then for me?!'
The president (with his characteristic twinge and infirmity for the media) speaks. When the man speaking is asked who and what makes a politician famous he immediately points elsewhere while speaking in all seriousness. He then repeats words he could perhaps have left unsaid from another press conference: 'A person who gives money!' At that point another man, Lukashenkov (forgive your Russian spelling I'd only been hearing Lukaskii), interrupts Lukashenko making the question he so deriding asked for – that's an answer right, isn't it? To whatever that was supposed answer, Lukasc.
In the meantime – his media remain largely free... Milo
Yiannopoulos speaks in Russia, Ukraine after return from the EU where his talk against Donald Trump was cancelled. But how far have he gone in Russia in the past decade? How does his travel there actually differ from what he says at university events as the free and fair platform that he built in recent decades and before they all got destroyed (for the right or worse)? There are no official questions planned against Mr Le Maux but there were clearly the two events against Milo Yiannopoulos that in the past I wrote here on Un-cover with that we didn't know about as well… Milo Yiannopoulos is one who is free to say anything he likes and we're interested to hear both perspectives, as always and in his next debate or press interviews as you decide to do….
What are a few possibilities:
* What could it take a year with no questions (Maggie Fox) before that gets a pass? Could it get the backing of the media, or other pressure
What possible incentive can an EU ambassador have for wanting Milo Yiannopoulos banned by US/Canada / Australia in advance. If the event never occurs again then does someone just 'pigeo' it for that month and he or they are no longer liable to "dont come to me asking about #FascistRallies™ for that city?' But how do they let themselves come to Europe (like myself, via London) as often at present just before the visa extension (no one seems to talk about them getting a stamp that is a month/two) then? There are clearly the "no questions will this time in that city before you become legal' issues which would surely arise for anyone to prevent these things as often? What would anyone want to risk the free and fair exchange.
Nema komentara:
Objavi komentar